Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to October 23, 2025, for the commencement of his defence.
The court session, which held on Thursday, October 16, 2025, drew widespread attention as journalists, lawyers, and supporters gathered to witness proceedings in one of Nigeria’s most high-profile cases.
During the hearing, the presiding judge ruled that the Department of State Services (DSS) medical facility remains adequate for Kanu’s medical care, stating that there was no substantial evidence to suggest that the IPOB leader was being denied appropriate treatment. The judge emphasized that the DSS has the capacity to provide the necessary healthcare required for Kanu’s condition while in custody.
The ruling comes after repeated concerns by Kanu’s legal team over his health and calls for him to be granted access to independent medical practitioners outside the DSS facility. However, the court maintained that the current arrangement was sufficient and in line with security and procedural standards.
In addition to setting a new date for the commencement of Kanu’s defence, the judge directed that the IPOB leader must conclude his defence by October 30, 2025. This decision is expected to accelerate the legal process, which has faced numerous adjournments since his arrest and extradition to Nigeria in 2021.
ALSO READ: Tompolo Donates ₦10 Billion to Delta State Security Trust Fund
The court’s ruling marks a critical phase in Kanu’s ongoing legal battle against the Federal Government, which has accused him of various offences, including treasonable felony and incitement.
Observers believe the next hearing could set the tone for the remaining stages of the trial, as both the prosecution and defence prepare for an intense legal showdown.
Supporters of the IPOB leader have continued to express optimism, urging for a fair and transparent judicial process. Meanwhile, political analysts say the outcome of Kanu’s case will have significant implications for Nigeria’s security and unity discourse.